貪婪：欲望之島

★ 5.7 播放：32萬 更新：2026-04-23
主演：金花媛 樸初炫 

女兒不在日本留學(xué)的媽媽寂寞。爸爸年輕女人和風(fēng)的事實(shí)是，除了知道其原因，兩人分居了。這老頭的兒子是父親的敵視媽媽安慰著。有一天，在美國的同事和朋友。她的旅日僑胞背帶暫時(shí)回國。凄涼的房子好久沒人，小聚會。

在線播放

劇情簡介

女兒不在日本留學(xué)的媽媽寂寞。爸爸年輕女人和風(fēng)的事實(shí)是，除了知道其原因，兩人分居了。這老頭的兒子是父親的敵視媽媽安慰著。有一天，在美國的同事和朋友。她的旅日僑胞背帶暫時(shí)回國。凄涼的房子好久沒人，小聚會。

導(dǎo)演精選

逆向誘拐

　　跨國投資銀行香港高層約翰收到勒索電郵，如不按指示三日內(nèi)交出約十九萬港幣，有關(guān)臺灣科網(wǎng)龍頭公司之機(jī)密融資分析就會被公開。為了公司聲譽(yù)，也為免客戶股價(jià)大幅波動，約翰暗中找來昔日大學(xué)舍堂堂友兼刑警唐輔協(xié)助調(diào)查。　　機(jī)密融資分析由約翰四位下屬負(fù)責(zé)，其中牧野一度失蹤，嫌疑極大。發(fā)現(xiàn)檔案在內(nèi)聯(lián)網(wǎng)被偷之小儒，因曾向電腦部職員阿植求救，結(jié)果整個(gè)團(tuán)隊(duì)連阿植六人，都被約翰安排到附近一間貴賓公寓套房，接受唐輔以至其手下全天候監(jiān)視，直至完成贖金交易。　　由于贖金奇少，綁匪顯然志不在錢，其多個(gè)古怪指示更令人困惑。當(dāng)阿植協(xié)助追蹤綁匪電郵源頭時(shí)，竟發(fā)現(xiàn)電郵是由公司伺服器發(fā)出，換言之綁匪必有內(nèi)應(yīng)。其后電郵證實(shí)來自阿植手機(jī)，縱然他在早上已遺失手機(jī)，而最后是小儒接觸他手機(jī)，阿植依然百詞莫辨。　　唐輔發(fā)現(xiàn)阿植家庭背景殊不簡單，疑似內(nèi)應(yīng)之神秘人又頻頻現(xiàn)身，加上科網(wǎng)公司原來曾有高層因新一代網(wǎng)上平臺開發(fā)延誤而被迫離職，甚至行蹤成疑，這一切都有關(guān)連嗎？　　由開發(fā)延誤導(dǎo)致融資失敗，由此可能觸發(fā)新一輪全球股災(zāi)，到最后綁匪竟要求用約翰用網(wǎng)上拍賣繳交贖款，究竟唐輔這一代會明白新一代的上網(wǎng)心態(tài)嗎？不了解又能否替約翰低調(diào)破案？阿植又可會知道誰是真兇？以至真兇為何要陷害他嗎？　　綁匪背后真正動機(jī)又是什麼？

狼人2025

　　布雷克（克里斯托弗·阿波特 Christopher Abbott 飾）是一名住在舊金山的丈夫和父親。當(dāng)他自己的父親失蹤并被判定死亡之后，他繼承了他位于俄勒岡州鄉(xiāng)下偏遠(yuǎn)地區(qū)的童年老家。當(dāng)他和他事業(yè)有成的女強(qiáng)人妻子夏莉特（朱莉婭·加納 Julia Garner 飾）的婚姻逐漸走向破裂，布雷克就說服夏莉特帶著他們年幼的女兒金潔（瑪?shù)贍栠_(dá)·弗 思 Matilda Firth 飾）一起離開城市，前往他的童年老家度假。　　但是當(dāng)這一家人在深夜來到這座農(nóng)舍時(shí)，他們突然遭到一只看不見的怪獸攻擊，為了逃離危險(xiǎn)，他們就躲進(jìn)農(nóng)舍里面，并且將所有入口封住，而那只怪獸則在外面徘徊。當(dāng)他們驚懼地試圖度過漫漫長夜時(shí)，布雷克卻開始出現(xiàn)奇怪的舉動，而且逐漸變成一種不知名的怪物，于是夏莉特就被迫必須決定：到底是屋內(nèi)的恐怖更致命，還是外面的危險(xiǎn)更可怕？

等待方舟

　　Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart.　　Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory?　　n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in.　　What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts.　　On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired.　　One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places.　　Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.